Buyer-ready answer register
Scoped answers that distinguish supported, partial, unknown and contradicted claims—without smoothing over the gaps.
AI assurance for enterprise deals
Turn buyer questionnaires, AI-use schedules, repository facts and provider terms into defensible answers—and see when a later change puts those answers at risk.
“Customer content is not retained or used to train third-party models.”
src/ai/client.ts:42product · tier · dateaccount evidence missingSupported for the reviewed API path; account-level feature evidence is still required.
Enterprise buyer asks
Evidence is scattered
Engineering loses days
Answers drift later
The deal-blocker
A new AI schedule lands during procurement. Security asks about training, retention, subprocessors, model routes and human oversight. Sales needs the answer this week.
The real work is not drafting plausible prose. It is knowing which claims the code and evidence actually support—and refusing to overstate the rest.
Bound the scope. Product, repository, environment, provider route and evidence date are explicit.
Show the basis. Material answers resolve to evidence and limitations a reviewer can inspect.
Keep uncertainty visible. Unknown and contradicted claims do not become confident marketing copy.
Founding pilot
Initial validation covers up to ten material AI-specific buyer questions and one deliberately bounded technical evidence set.
Scoped answers that distinguish supported, partial, unknown and contradicted claims—without smoothing over the gaps.
A reviewable map of models, providers, features, data classes and relevant repository evidence at a defined snapshot.
Every material answer links back to code, configuration, tests, customer evidence or a scoped provider source.
One simulated later change shows exactly which customer promises and proposed controls would need review.
How the validation works
We check the buyer artefact, deadline, product scope and whether this service is the right intervention.
Before review, we agree the questions, repository snapshot, provider routes, inputs, exclusions and deletion date.
Claims are decomposed, linked to evidence, classified and challenged before any buyer-ready wording is approved.
One later code or provider change is simulated to reveal which commitments and controls would need attention.
Confidential qualification
This takes about four minutes. Do not upload or paste contracts, source code, secrets or personal customer information here.
Before you submit
No. PromiseTrace is a bounded evidence-compilation and assurance-readiness service. It does not certify compliance, replace counsel, perform a penetration test or guarantee that a buyer will approve an answer.
No. The validation pilot uses a deliberately bounded snapshot or selected paths. Where repository material cannot leave your environment, we will test a customer-run or local-review approach instead.
A named human reviewer approves every buyer-facing conclusion. The reviewer and legal counterparty are disclosed privately before confidential material is shared or a paid engagement begins.
The public form collects only qualification information—never contracts or source code. Any later evidence transfer requires an agreed scope and handling process. Survey responses are ordinarily retained for no more than 90 days.